The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Study: US and European Patient and Health Care Professional Perceptions of the Experience and Impact of Symptoms of Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aimed to evaluate the experience and impact of ulcerative colitis (UC) symptoms on patients' lives and elucidate gaps in communication between patients and health care professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Online, quantitative, cross-sectional surveys of patients with moderate-to-severe UC and HCPs responsible for making prescribing decisions were conducted in the United States (US) and Europe. UC disease severity was defined by treatment, steroid use, and/or hospitalization history. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 200 US and 556 European patients and 200 US and 503 European HCPs. The most common UC symptoms experienced in the preceding month were diarrhea, bowel urgency, and increased stool frequency. Many patients (45.0% of US patients, 37.0% of European patients) reported wearing diapers/pads/protection at least once a week in the past 3 months due to fear/anticipation of fecal urge incontinence. The top reasons for declining participation in social events, work/school, and sports/exercise were due to bowel urgency and fear of fecal urge incontinence. HCPs ranked diarrhea, blood in stool, and increased stool frequency as the most common symptoms. While over half HCPs ranked bowel urgency as a top symptom affecting patients' lives, less than a quarter ranked it in the top 3 most impactful on treatment decisions. CONCLUSIONS: Similar disparities exist between patient and HCP perceptions in the United States and Europe on the experience and impact of UC symptoms. Bowel urgency has a substantial and similar impact on US and European patients, is underappreciated by HCPs, and should be addressed during routine appointments.

Real-world Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes Associated With Palbociclib Combination Therapy: A Multinational, Pooled Analysis From the Ibrance Real World Insights Study.

PURPOSE: Palbociclib was the first cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for use in combination with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) as initial endocrine-based therapy or with fulvestrant in postmenopausal women who previously received endocrine therapy based on data from randomized clinical trials. Real-world studies examining the effectiveness of palbociclib in large, diverse patient populations in routine clinical practice were needed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) was a retrospective medical record review study of women with confirmed hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer treated with palbociclib plus an AI or with palbociclib plus fulvestrant according to approved indications. Participating physicians reviewed medical records of up to 16 sequentially presenting patients, collecting demographic and clinical data. Outcomes included objective response rates, progression-free rates, and survival rates overall and in patients stratified according to age, race and ethnicity, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS), disease-free interval, visceral disease, liver metastases, bone-only metastases, and previous lines of therapy. FINDINGS: Data were abstracted by 417 physicians for 2954 patients in 13 countries; 1415 patients (47.9%) were ≥65 years of age, 369 patients (12.5%) had an ECOG PS ≥2 at initiation, and 835 patients (28.3%) were races other than White. The 12-month progression-free rate was 88% for palbociclib plus an AI and 79% for palbociclib plus fulvestrant; the 12-month survival rate was 96% in both groups. The objective response rates were 80% for palbociclib plus an AI and 75% for palbociclib plus fulvestrant. Palbociclib was similarly effective in most subgroups examined. IMPLICATIONS: Data from IRIS provide in-depth, real-world evidence for the use of palbociclib in a range of breast cancer populations in multiple countries. These data support the findings of the randomized PALOMA-2 and PALOMA-3 studies.

Patient journey in erosive oesophagitis: real-world perspectives from US physicians and patients.

OBJECTIVE: Management of erosive oesophagitis (EE) remains suboptimal, with many patients experiencing incomplete healing, ongoing symptoms, and relapse despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. The Study of Acid-Related Disorders investigated patient burden of individuals with EE in a real-world setting. DESIGN: US gastroenterologists (GIs) or family physicians (FPs)/general practitioners (GPs) treating patients with EE completed a physician survey and enrolled up to four patients with EE for a patient survey, with prespecified data extracted from medical records. RESULTS: 102 GIs and 149 FPs/GPs completed the survey; data were available for 73 patients (mean age at diagnosis, 45.4 years). Omeprazole was healthcare professional (HCP)-preferred first-line treatment (60.8% GIs; 56.4% FPs/GPs), and pantoprazole preferred second line (29.4% and 32.9%, respectively). Price and insurance coverage (both 55.5% HCPs) and familiarity (47.9%) key drivers for omeprazole; insurance coverage (52.0%), price (50.0%), familiarity (48.0%), initial symptom relief (46.0%), and safety (44.0%) key drivers for pantoprazole. Only 49.3% patients took medication as instructed all the time; 56.8% independently increased medication frequency some of the time. Despite treatment, 57.5% patients experienced heartburn and 30.1% regurgitation; heartburn was the most bothersome symptom. 58.9% patients believed that their symptoms could be better controlled; only 28.3% HCPs were very satisfied with current treatment options. 83.6% patients wanted long-lasting treatment options. Fast symptom relief for patients was a top priority for 66.1% HCPs, while 56.6% would welcome alternatives to PPIs. CONCLUSION: This real-world multicentre study highlights the need for new, rapidly acting treatments in EE that reduce symptom burden, offer durable healing and provide symptom control.

Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients receiving palbociclib combinations for HR+/HER2- advanced/metastatic breast cancer in Japan: Results from the IRIS study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of breast cancer is rising in Japan, particularly in postmenopausal women. The CDK 4/6 inhibitor palbociclib has demonstrated efficacy in clinical studies in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced/metastatic breast cancer (ABC/MBC). The Ibrance Real World Insights (IRIS) study (NCT03159195) collected real-world data for palbociclib-treated patients in several countries including Japan, where such data are currently scarce. METHODS: IRIS was a retrospective chart review study of patients with confirmed HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC receiving palbociclib according to approved indications in real-world clinical practice. In Japan, physicians each abstracted data from patient medical records for up to eight sequential patients treated with palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (P+AI) or fulvestrant (P+F). Outcomes included progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs). RESULTS: Fifty-eight physicians abstracted data for 170 patients receiving palbociclib in the first (64.1%) or second or later line (35.9%), in combination with AI (51.2%) or fulvestrant (48.8%). Median follow-up was 10.4 months. Most patients were initiated on palbociclib 125 mg/d (P+AI, 63.2%; P+F, 78.3%). PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 76.2% and 52.6%, respectively, for P+AI and 71.6% and 65.6%, respectively for P+F. PFRs at 12 and 24 months were 85.4% and 66.5%, respectively, for first-line palbociclib combinations and 56.4% and 50.7%, respectively, for second- or later-line palbociclib combinations. CONCLUSIONS: In this analysis of the Japanese IRIS cohort, outcomes in terms of PFRs and SRs appear to be better with first- versus second or later-line palbociclib, regardless of the endocrine partner.

Real-world treatment of patients with palbociclib for HR+/HER2-advanced/metastatic breast cancer: the Europe IRIS study.

Aim: To report the Europe Ibrance Real World Insights study findings. Methods: Physicians abstracted demographic/clinical characteristics, treatment and outcomes data for women with HR+/HER2- locally advanced breast cancer (ABC) or metastatic  breast cancer (MBC) receiving palbociclib + aromatase inhibitor (AI) or palbociclib + fulvestrant. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated progression-free rates (PFRs) and survival rates (SRs). Results: 238 physicians abstracted data for 1723 patients. For patients (>90%) initiating at 125 mg/day, dose was reduced in 18.9% of palbociclib + AI and 12.3% of palbociclib + fulvestrant patients. At 12 months, PFR for palbociclib + AI was 88.1%, and SR was 97.3%; PFR for palbociclib + fulvestrant was 79.8%, and SR was 97.5%. Conclusion: Low dose-reduction rates and favorable PFRs and SRs suggest that palbociclib + AI/fulvestrant is well tolerated and effective for HR+/HER2- ABC/MBC in real-world clinical practice.

Lay abstract We describe findings of the Europe Ibrance Real World Insights study. Patients were women with a common type of breast cancer that had worsened but not spread or that had spread. Doctors collected medical information about the women and looked at their progress while on treatment. The treatment was either palbociclib + an aromatase inhibitor or palbociclib + fulvestrant. Two hundred thirty-eight doctors collected information on 1723 women. More than 90% of women started this treatment at a dose of 125 mg/day; the dose was reduced for fewer than 20% of women. At 12 months, more than 80% of women survived without their breast cancer worsening, and more than 97% of women survived. These good results suggest that this treatment is safe and effective for women with breast cancer that had worsened but not spread or that had spread.

Real-world impact of flaring on patient-reported outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation in systemic lupus erythematosus.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the association of SLE flares with patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and healthcare resource utilisation (HCRU) using real-world data. METHODS: Rheumatologists from the USA, France, Germany, Spain, Italy provided demographic, clinical, and HCRU data for patients with SLE, who provided PRO data. "Flaring" was defined as ≥1 rheumatologist-reported flare in the past 12 months. Demographic/clinical data were analysed descriptively, and findings compared statistically by flaring status. Logistic regression estimated a propensity score for flaring based on ethnicity, disease duration, and severity at diagnosis. Propensity score-matched flaring and non-flaring patients were compared for their HCRU, PROs, income loss and treatment satisfaction. RESULTS: Physicians (n=263) provided data for 1,278 patients (408 flaring/870 non-flaring); 729 patients (241 flaring/488 non-flaring) provided matched patient data. Patients had a mean 2.1 flares in the previous 12 months. Propensity score matched analyses indicated worse outcomes and greater HCRU in the past 12 months in flaring than non-flaring patients: EuroQoL 5D-3L Utility Index: 0.72 vs. 0.83; Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale: 30.06 vs. 36.48; Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Index: absenteeism 5.87% vs. 2.53% / presenteeism 33.44% vs. 19.16% / overall work impairment 35.98% vs. 20.66% / total activity impairment 42.47% vs. 30.23%; healthcare consultations (8.10 vs. 6.41), hospitalisations (24.26 vs. 7.63), emergency department visits (20.83 vs. 4.19), tests (46.59 vs. 38.90); current medications (2.76 vs. 2.19) (all p<0.001 except absenteeism, p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Similar flaring SLE patients had worse PROs and higher HCRU than non-flaring patients, underscoring the need for more effective strategies and treatments to alleviate or prevent flaring.

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Symptom Clusters and Their Association With Patient-Reported Outcomes and Treatment: Analysis of Real-World Data.

OBJECTIVE: To identify discrete clusters of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients based on symptoms and investigate differences across clusters. METHODS: Data were collected in the US and 5 European countries via the Adelphi Real World Lupus Disease Specific Programme, a cross-sectional survey. Rheumatologists provided data for 5 consecutively consulting adult patients with SLE, who were invited to participate. Identified SLE symptoms were reduced to factors based on commonly concurrent symptoms, using principal-component factor analysis. Factors were used as covariates in a latent-class cluster analysis to identify discrete patient clusters. Patient-reported outcomes and physician-reported data were compared across clusters. RESULTS: Among 1,376 patients, 87% were female and 74% were White. We identified 4 patient clusters (very mild, mild, moderate, and severe) based on 39 signs/symptoms. Physician-reported symptom burden, organ involvement, disease activity, and the number of flares increased with increasing cluster severity (P < 0.0001). Patient-reported impact (health status, fatigue, work productivity impairment, anxiety/depression, and emotional impact) increased with increasing cluster severity (P < 0.0001). Glucocorticoid and immunosuppressant use increased, and antimalarial use decreased, with increasing cluster severity. In all clusters, <20% of patients received biologics; >15% of patients not receiving biologics were considered eligible for treatment by their physician. The proportion of physicians and patients satisfied with treatment decreased with increasing cluster severity (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our large, international, real-world survey of SLE patients and physicians demonstrated strong associations between increased impairment, organ involvement, and humanistic burden in SLE, highlighting an unmet need for effective treatment options in patients with high disease activity.

P028 Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) Survey: Patient and Healthcare Professional Perspectives on Experience of Ulcerative Colitis Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are associated with substantial quality of life and economic burdens (Kawalec, 2016). The Communicating Needs and Features of IBD Experiences (CONFIDE) study aims to further the understanding of the experience and impact of symptoms on patients' lives and elucidate any gaps in communication between healthcare professionals (HCPs) and patients with moderate-to-severe UC and CD in the United States (US), Europe, and Japan. These data focus on US patients with UC and US HCPs. METHODS: An online, quantitative, cross-sectional survey was conducted with HCPs (n=200) and patients with moderate-to-severe UC (n=200) in the US between May (HCPs) and July (patients) 2021. Moderate-to-severe UC was defined using criteria based on previous treatment experience, steroid use and/or hospitalization. The HCP survey included physicians (89%) and non-physician HCPs (11%) who are responsible for making prescribing decisions. Data collected included perspectives on the experience and impact of symptoms in patients with moderate-to-severe UC. RESULTS: The top three symptoms currently (past month) and ever suffered by patients (mean age: 40.4, 61.5% male) were diarrhea (62.5% and 74.0%, respectively), bowel urgency (47.0% and 61.5%) and increased stool frequency (38.5% and 57.5%). Blood in stool was reported by 27.0% of patients as currently suffering, and 51.0% ever. According to HCPs (78.0% male), the top three symptoms reported by patients were diarrhea (73.5% ranked in top 3), blood in stool (69.0%), and increased stool frequency (37.5%). Bowel urgency was recorded in the top 3 patient-reported symptoms by 24.0% of HCPs. Patients self-rated their disease-severity as 10.5% (n = 21) mild UC, 71.0% (n = 142) moderate UC, 17.5% (n = 35) severe UC, and 1.0% (n = 2) patients did not know. Bowel urgency was more frequently reported in patients with severe disease (62.9%, n = 22) when compared with those with mild-to-moderate disease (42.9%, n = 70). Among the overall patient population, 76.5% (n = 153) were receiving advanced therapies (biologic or novel oral therapy). Bowel urgency was currently experienced by 46.4% of these patients. Only 38.2% of patients felt completely comfortable reporting bowel urgency to their HCP. Of patients not comfortable reporting bowel urgency, 62.2% (n = 23) reported they felt embarrassed talking about it. Among HCPs, 75.5% (n = 151) reported they proactively discussed bowel urgency at routine appointments. Those HCPs who reported that they do not proactively discuss bowel urgency (24.5%, n = 49) cited the main reason as they expect the patient to bring it up (46.9%, n = 23). CONCLUSION: Bowel urgency is the second-most commonly reported symptom by patients with moderate-to-severe UC but is not among the HCP-perceived top three most reported symptoms. A substantial proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe UC receiving advanced therapies continue to report bowel urgency. A communication gap between patients and HCPs was identified and highlights the under appreciation of bowel urgency as an important symptom impacting patients' daily life.